This is a blog dedicated to the Marketing of Healthcare Services. I welcome comments and feedback.

Blog Search

Anas' Weblog

Sunday, August 9, 2009

Marketing With In


Memorial HospitalHere is an interesting exercise that I recommend hospital marketers to try out with their colleagues in the hospital. Select a group of 30 individuals working in the hospital, preferably those who handle customers. Include in the group a few medical folks, doctors, nurses, front office executives, billing executives, F&B personnel and a few guys from housekeeping. Ask them simple questions on what the hospital brand means to them.

You would be surprised with the variety of answers you are likely to get.

All marketers try and look for a unique customer proposition for their hospitals, one which they believe the hospital delivers to its customers. The proposition is carefully selected after many a long ‘brain storming’ sessions involving the hospital’s leadership team, the branding and communications experts from advertising agencies pitching for the lucrative account. After these hectic sessions what often emerges is a positioning statement, which is than condensed into the hospital baseline, which is than incorporated in the logo of the hospital. It is in essence the consumer promise, which than is communicated to the external world in right earnest. However, what they fail to do is communicate this promise with the same vigour and zeal with customer facing employees, who are actually tasked with delivering this promise.

Let me take examples from two hospitals, where I used to work.

Artemis Health Institute in Gurgaon says that it is all about the ‘art of healthcare’. Max Healthcare similarly professes to be ‘caring for you …for life’. Artemis believes that its services are differentiated from other hospitals because it focuses on the softer side of medicine. The arguement is that the best infrastructure and world class medical faculty is a given, and easy to replicate. What really distinguishes this hospital from others is not what it delivers but how it delivers. Similarly Max Healthcare is all about superlative care, what the hospital calls ‘patient centric care’. It prides itself in delivering great patient care at all customer touchpoints and at every patient interaction.

Now these are indeed lofty goals. I would even go ahead and aver that when these hospitals were being conceived and set up, the founding teams did believe in these ideals. The hospital communication program was designed to put across these differentiations and a fair amount of energy and effort was expanded in developing communication, which helped establish the hospital’s core values. However, and here is the nub of the matter, these hospitals just did not do enough to communicate these values to their own folks down the line who were actually supposed to deliver these sterling objectives.

In the initial days of commencing operations the hospitals did make an effort to train people in handling and treating patients as customers. However, the initial enthusiasm waned soon enough, competition poached many a well trained individuals and somewhere in the hurly burly of running large hospitals the idealism of the past gave way to an all pervading cynicism. Training individuals in the ideals and core beliefs of the hospital became a chore and the trainers too lost their passion.Thus the marketing promise, the all important differentiator remains only in the minds of resolute brand managers who faithfully continue to reproduce these lines with the hospital logos and the colours.

Unfortunately, this is true of most hospitals I know. A brand promise must be delivered unerringly and all the time. For, which hospitals must spend time and serious effort in keeping the promise alive amongst those who are supposed to deliver it a million times everyday.

Pic courtesy www.flickr.com

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

National Emergency Services-The Need of the Hour


Emergency ServicesThe other day I was at the Delhi airport early in the morning waiting for the security check to get over, when I realised there was some commotion ahead in the queue. As I moved on, I saw a man flat on his back, and a lady, apparently an air hostess trying to revive him by administering the CPR. There were a bunch of people including some security men looking on. The lady was doing her best, but it was quite apparent that she would not succeed. She appeared to be going through the motions rather than making a desperate attempt to save a life.There was no one else to help her, while many watched idly. I did not see any medical personnel or the emergency medical paraphernalia, that one would expect on such an occasion. The man had been without a pulse for almost 20 minutes, before CPR had commenced.

How can a busy airport (brand new to boot) be without adequate medical emergency back-up? Almost a year ago when I was working for Artemis, we had proposed to the authorities to allow us to set up an emergency service at the airport. Artemis is reasonably close to the airport, has an Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) equipped ambulance service and the hospital is fully geared to manage medical emergencies round the clock. Nothing came of our proposal and the last we heard was that Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals has been awarded the contract to manage the medical room at the airport. Apollo Hospital is all of 40 kms or more from the airport and with the traffic that one usually encounters on the way, there is no way that an ambulance can reach the hospital in less than an hour. That fateful day, there was no one for at least 30 minutes from Apollo or anywhere else, to help the unfortunate man.

India attracts scores of patients from across the world, most of them benefit from the world class healthcare services now available in the country yet we do not have an emergency service that can be remotely called world class. This is a serious concern.

The government must take the lead in establishing a centralised medical emergency service through a statutory body, let us say, Medical Emergency Services Authority of India. It can work out the details of how this service will operate, the nodal hospitals, the communication infrastructure and the logistics of transporting patients to these network hospitals. It should set clear guidelines on managing emergencies (who, what, where, how), establish internationally benchmarked service levels and establish a monitoring authority to measure efficiency and service levels

The Medical Emergency Services Authority should be allowed to set up emergency handling outlets in high traffic areas like airports, on national highways and busy malls etc. The Authority would be required to invest in the communications and transport infrastructure including paramedical personnel, while the participating/network hospitals will be responsible for patient's care once the patient reaches the hospital.

While all this and more is possible, the key question is whether we should have private participation in something like this. I believe we should not. This is a service that should be rendered by the government to its citizens in distress. It should be paid for by the taxpayers. The government can charge a small sum from the taxpayers annually to keep the service afloat. The real challenge for the government would be to maintain high standards in the face of crippling bureaucratic controls that underlie all government initiatives. Corruption, sloth and inefficiency so characteristic of all government organisations must not be allowed to eat at the vitals of this service.

Easier said than done. Maybe the government can find another Nandan Nilekani or an E Sridharan and give him a free hand to set this up. I would like to believe if there is a will and a burning desire to accomplish something as important as setting up the National Emergency Services a way can certainly be found. It is afterall the need of the hour.

Pic courtesy www.flickr.com